In this paper we consider a fundamental problem in the area of viral marketing, called T{\scriptsize ARGET} S{\scriptsize ET} S{\scriptsize ELECTION} problem. In a a viral marketing setting, social networks are modeled by graphs with potential customers of a new product as vertices and friend relationships as edges, where each vertex $v$ is assigned a threshold value $\theta(v)$. The thresholds represent the different latent tendencies of customers (vertices) to buy the new product when their friend (neighbors) do. Consider a repetitive process on social network $(G,\theta)$ where each vertex $v$ is associated with two states, active and inactive, which indicate whether $v$ is persuaded into buying the new product. Suppose we are given a target set $S\subseteq V(G)$. Initially, all vertices in $G$ are inactive. At time step 0, we choose all vertices in $S$ to become active. Then, at every time step $t>0$, all vertices that were active in time step $t-1$ remain active, and we activate any vertex $v$ if at least $\theta(v)$ of its neighbors were active at time step $t-1$. The activation process terminates when no more vertices can get activated. We are interested in the following optimization problem, called T{\scriptsize ARGET} S{\scriptsize ET} S{\scriptsize ELECTION}: Finding a target set $S$ of smallest possible size that activates all vertices of $G$. There is an important and well-studied threshold called strict majority threshold, where for every vertex $v$ in $G$ we have $\theta(v)=\lceil{(d(v) +1)/2}\rceil$ and $d(v)$ is the degree of $v$ in $G$. In this paper, we consider the T{\scriptsize ARGET} S{\scriptsize ET} S{\scriptsize ELECTION} problem under strict majority thresholds and focus on three popular regular network structures: cycle permutation graphs, generalized Petersen graphs and torus cordalis.

Thanks. We have received your report. If we find this content to be in
violation of our guidelines,
we will remove it.

Ok