Monika Henzinger, Sagar Kale

With input sizes becoming massive, coresets---small yet representative summary of the input---are relevant more than ever. A weighted set $C_w$ that is a subset of the input is an $\varepsilon$-coreset if the cost of any feasible solution $S$ with respect to $C_w$ is within $[1 {\pm} \varepsilon]$ of the cost of $S$ with respect to the original input. We give a very general technique to compute coresets in the fully-dynamic setting where input points can be added or deleted. Given a static $\varepsilon$-coreset algorithm that runs in time $t(n, \varepsilon, \lambda)$ and computes a coreset of size $s(n, \varepsilon, \lambda)$, where $n$ is the number of input points and $1 {-}\lambda$ is the success probability, we give a fully-dynamic algorithm that computes an $\varepsilon$-coreset with worst-case update time $O((\log n) \cdot t(s(n, \varepsilon/\log n, \lambda/n), \varepsilon/\log n, \lambda/n) )$ (this bound is stated informally), where the success probability is $1{-}\lambda$. Our technique is a fully-dynamic analog of the merge-and-reduce technique that applies to insertion-only setting. Although our space usage is $O(n)$, we work in the presence of an adaptive adversary. As a consequence, we get fully-dynamic $\varepsilon$-coreset algorithms for $k$-median and $k$-means with worst-case update time $O(\varepsilon^{-2}k^2\log^5 n \log^3 k)$ and coreset size $O(\varepsilon^{-2}k\log n \log^2 k)$ ignoring $\log \log n$ and $\log(1/\varepsilon)$ factors and assuming that $\varepsilon, \lambda = \Omega(1/$poly$(n))$ (very weak assumptions made to make bounds easy to parse). These are the first fully-dynamic algorithms for $k$-median and $k$-means with worst-case update times $O($poly$(k, \log n, \varepsilon^{-1}))$. The best previous bound for both problems was amortized $O(n\log n)$ by Cohen-Addad et al. via randomized $O(1)$-coresets in $O(n)$ space.

Knowledge Graph

arrow_drop_up

Comments

Sign up or login to leave a comment